Plate scale and field of view
- Builds on
- Section 5.1
- Reading time
- 30 min
- Exercises
- 4
- Olympiad problems
- 0
With a camera whose sensor is 22.5 mm wide at the focus of the telescope of IOAA 2026, focal length 750 mm, Orion's belt does not fit on the picture. Alnitak and Mintaka are 2.74° apart on the sky, and their images land 35.9 mm apart in the focal plane. The same camera on a lens of focal length 50 mm covers about 26° along its sensor and takes in the whole of Orion. In this section we see how the focal length turns angles on the sky into millimetres on a sensor, how much sky each pixel and the whole sensor cover, and how long the shutter can stay open before the turning of the Earth smears each star into a short line.
5.2.1The plate scale
Two stars are 1′ apart on the sky. How far apart are their images in the focal plane of a telescope of focal length 1 m?
Section S4 showed that two stars an angle
| the focal length of the telescope or lens | |
| the angle on the sky covered by one pixel of a camera, called the pixel scale | |
| the width of one pixel, in the same unit as |
What is the plate scale, in arcseconds per millimetre, of a telescope of focal length 750 mm?
A camera with pixels 10 µm wide sits at the focus of a telescope of focal length 1.00 m. Two stars are 20″ apart. How many pixels apart are their images?
With
so the two images are
5.2.2The field of view of a camera
The field of view of a camera is the angle of sky that its sensor covers. A sensor of width
Will the whole of Orion's belt, 2.74° long, fit across a sensor 22.5 mm wide at the focus of the telescope of IOAA 2026, focal length 750 mm?
The sensor covers
and the belt is 2.74° long, which would need
5.2.3Star trails
A camera on a fixed tripod stays still while the sky turns, so every star drifts across the sensor. A star on the celestial equator moves through 360° in one sidereal day of 23 h 56 min 4 s (Section 2.1), which is 15.04″ every second. A star at declination
| the longest exposure, in seconds, for which a star moves by less than one pixel | |
| the pixel scale, in arcseconds per pixel | |
| the declination of the star |
With a pixel scale of 4.44″ per pixel, how long can a fixed camera expose before a star at declination 60° moves by one pixel?
At declination 60° a star moves
The star moves
twice as long as for a star on the equator.
The olympiad problem on astrophotography from 2020, restated in Section 1.1, asks for exactly this exposure, for a camera with a 150 mm lens and pixels 3.23 µm apart.
- The rule
needs in radians. With in arcseconds it must be divided by 206 265 first. - The plate scale is an angle per unit length and the pixel scale an angle per pixel. They differ by the width of a pixel, which is usually given in micrometres and must be turned into millimetres.
- The stars near the celestial pole move more slowly across the sky than those on the equator. Forgetting the factor
gives an exposure that is too short for those stars.
- 5.2.1
A camera with pixels 3.76 µm wide sits at the focus of the telescope of IOAA 2026, focal length 750 mm. What is its pixel scale?
″ per pixelBy (5.3), per pixel. - 5.2.2
Jupiter is 45″ across. How many pixels does its image cover from side to side with a pixel scale of 1.03″ per pixel?
pixelsThe image covers pixels from side to side. - 5.2.3
A camera lens of focal length 150 mm is used with a sensor 22.5 mm wide. What field of view does it give, in degrees?
degreesThe sensor covers rad, which is 8.6°. The exact value, , is 8.58°. - 5.2.4
A camera on a tripod photographs two stars with the same exposure, one on the celestial equator and one at declination 70°. Which leaves the longer trail?
The answer is (b). The star on the equator moves 15.04″ each second, while the star at declination 70° moves only each second.